Fraud Detection - Who Loses...
Written By:
Kia Javadi
Through successful marketing tactics and
a general lack of proper knowledge fully embedded within our
culture, the larger credit card companies have tackled most
consumer concerns when it comes to liability in situations
of fraud and identity theft. Virtually every new
credit card application, offer, or advertisement boasts the
authorizing provider's card security and fraud-proof
guarantees. These guarantees have instilled a
necessary confidence within consumers that both enables
eCommerce trading and has made the credit card the chosen
method in such transactions.
Your Liability In The Transaction...
While liability guarantees may have
enabled an entire internet sales industry - one in which your
business may actively participate in - you will be surprised to
learn that the guarantor is not who you may think. The
guarantor is actually you, the merchant. While most
consumers and sellers alike are led to believe that their interests
are being protected directly by
the card issuing Visa/MasterCard, Discover, or American Express
companies, it is in fact
these companies' willingness to exercise their control over a
merchant's depositing account that funds this security. You will
quickly learn that when a situation presented may hint or eventually lead towards fraud (by almost any circumstance,) a hold will quickly be placed
in the
amount of the transaction in question on the merchant's depositing
account and the burden of proof will then be placed
upon them to prove that the cardholder: a) placed the charge
knowingly, b) gave authorization to the charge, c) physically received
the goods in the conditions presented and made aware to them at the
time of purchase, and d) provided a confirmation that the charge was
to be applied (ie- signature, etc.) In instances that seem all
too common, proving these points may not even be enough. Being in the
highest risk category (card not present merchants) online resellers
oftentimes receive chargebacks that seem to be un-winnable regardless
of the case presented. With the threat of your accounts being
frozen or your merchant processing capabilities closed, it is
sometimes difficult to argue with whatever ruling is handed down to you.
With the anti-merchant/pro-consumer rules in place, abuses to the
system have become a very serious threat.
Without going too far
overboard, one could argue that any losses encountered due to
fraudulent activity are felt solely by the merchant. A consumer who had a charge placed on their account
and was later refunded/credited sees no net effect and thus shows
little involvement outside of maybe an initial scare or uncertainty. The fraudster (who
could in fact turn out to be the original consumer) obtains
whatever item/service they were able to get a hold of at little or no cost or
consequence. The merchant processor may come out the clear-cut
winner, however, as they charge the merchant a processing fee and
percentage for the original transaction (which is never refunded),
follow that up with a substantial chargeback fee (ranging from $10-$50
and again which will never be refunded), and then again charge the
merchant the same processing and percentage fees for issuing the credit
(again, money that is never returned.) It would be unfair to
suggest that merchant processors actively pursue chargebacks, but
there is no denying that the seem to reap benefits from the rules and
practices of today.
It should be said that not
every chargeback leads to disaster for the merchant. While there
is never a way around the nonrefundable fee Chargeback Fees, if the
actual transaction was valid and you have completed it with the proper
authorization procedures, you should have a good case in any
chargeback arbitration. This does not guarantee victory, but it
does greatly improve your chances of a favorable settlement. Al
always, it is important to remember to retain as much evidence as
possible and to secure these records for evidence in case the need
arises.
While all of the rules seem
unfair and set to discourage business, it is quite simply the only
feasible way of going about it. The industry average for chargebacks is estimated to be just above .5% of the total number of
transactions with the most predominant reason for a chargebacks being
a buyer not recognizing the name of the company they had purchased
from on their statement. This type of chargeback can usually be
corrected if in fact the customer 'recalls' the transaction after
learning more about it. Unfortunately, though, this information
provides little comfort when the threat of a chargeback is received
and the products/services have already been delivered. This
makes it all the more important to install systems necessary for
detection and to educate yourself to see through a fraudster and to
catch them before they succeed in defrauding your company.
Before, companies were able
to take a 'Circle-of-Life' approach to distributing the losses
encountered due to fraud;
the merchant loss leading to increased prices and indirectly being
paid for by future consumers. With eCommerce and customer loyalty
not being quite as resolute anymore, a highly sophisticated online shopping populous
now has the means and desire to seek out the lowest prices and is more
than willing to jump to another supplier at any time. A key to
driving your prices down is to minimize the many external factors and
overhead costs that are not keyed directly in to the buy/sell
transaction. Fraud may very well be the largest of those
external factors and can be devastatingly unpredictable.
|